Cinta Tanpa Syarat dan Solidaritas Sosial Filsafat Kierkegaard dalam Konteks Indonesia Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.46362/ijr.v7i1.69
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Religious, Vol.7, No.1 (April 2024)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Yugiantie Solaiman
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Indonesia
Tan Winda
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Widya Agape

Abstract

This research focuses on Søren Kierkegaard's thoughts on love for others, which emphasizes the importance of sacrifice and moral action in human relationships. Love, in Kierkegaard's perspective, is not just a feeling, but a moral commitment that requires sacrifice for the good of others. In Indonesia, although values such as gotong royong (mutual cooperation) and social solidarity already exist, significant challenges arise due to the shift towards individualism that is increasingly developing. The aim of this research is to analyze the principles of love for others according to Kierkegaard and how they can be applied in the social and cultural context of Indonesia. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative approach, involving literature review and interviews with philosophy experts and community leaders. This research also uses a comparative approach to contrast Kierkegaard's thoughts with Indonesian cultural values such as gotong royong and social solidarity. The findings show that despite the challenges in implementing Kierkegaard's concept of love in Indonesia, these values of unconditional love are still highly relevant to strengthen social solidarity and create a more just society. The contribution of this research is to provide a new perspective on the application of Kierkegaard's moral love principles in Indonesia, which can be used to build a more caring and just society.


 


Latar belakang penelitian ini berfokus pada pemikiran Søren Kierkegaard mengenai cinta terhadap sesama, yang menekankan pentingnya pengorbanan dan tindakan moral dalam hubungan antar manusia. Cinta dalam perspektif Kierkegaard tidak hanya sekadar perasaan, tetapi juga sebuah komitmen moral yang membutuhkan pengorbanan demi kebaikan orang lain. Di Indonesia, meskipun nilai-nilai seperti gotong royong dan solidaritas sosial sudah ada, tantangan besar muncul akibat pergeseran nilai menuju individualisme yang semakin berkembang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis prinsip-prinsip cinta terhadap sesama menurut Kierkegaard dan bagaimana penerapannya dalam konteks sosial dan budaya Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, yang melibatkan studi literatur dan wawancara dengan para ahli filsafat dan tokoh masyarakat. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan komparatif untuk membandingkan pemikiran Kierkegaard dengan nilai-nilai budaya Indonesia, seperti gotong royong dan solidaritas sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada tantangan dalam implementasi konsep cinta Kierkegaard di Indonesia, nilai-nilai cinta tanpa syarat ini masih sangat relevan untuk memperkuat solidaritas sosial dan menciptakan masyarakat yang lebih adil. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah memberikan perspektif baru tentang penerapan prinsip cinta moral Kierkegaard di Indonesia, yang dapat digunakan untuk membangun masyarakat yang lebih peduli dan berkeadilan.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Solaiman, Y., & Winda, T. (2023). Cinta Tanpa Syarat dan Solidaritas Sosial: Filsafat Kierkegaard dalam Konteks Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Religious, 7(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.46362/ijr.v7i1.69

References

  1. Alfsvåg, K. (2021). Kierkegaard on indiscriminate love. Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology, 76(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2021.1942199
  2. Barrett, L. C. (2022). Kierkegaard on Divine Grace, Human Agency, and Love. Studies in Christian Ethics, 35(4), 684-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468221107528.
  3. Carpintero, R. (2024). Love Through Patience: A Contribution to the Kierkegaardian Discussion on the Spiritual Nature of Love Relationships. Religions, 15(11), 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111372.
  4. Cleary, S. (2015). Søren Kierkegaard and Loving Aesthetically. In: Existentialism and Romantic Love. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455802_3
  5. Dalferth, I. (2013). Selfless Passion: Kierkegaard on True Love. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook, 2013(1), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1515/kier.2013.2013.1.159.
  6. Dinan, M. (2021). Kierkegaard’s Socratic Alternative to Hegel in Fear and Trembling. The Review of Politics, 83(3), 375–397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27111555.
  7. Furnal, J. (2017). The Dialectic of Faith and Reason in Cornelio Fabro’s Reading of Kierkegaard’s Theology. Theological Studies, 78(3), 718-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563917714618.
  8. Green, D. N. (2013). Works of Love in a World of Violence: Kierkegaard, Feminism, and the Limits of Self‐Sacrifice. Hypatia, 28(3), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12009.
  9. Hanson, J. (2023). The Oneness of Love in Works of Love. Religions, 14(12), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121517.
  10. Hodel J. (2024). Hegel as a ‘backward-looking prophet’?: Kierkegaard’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of history. Hegel Bulletin. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2024.44.
  11. Huls, Jos. (2011). Love founded in God: the fruits of love in Kierkegaard's 'Works of love'. HTS Theological Studies, 67(3), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v67i3.1116.
  12. Kierkegaard, Søren. (1993). Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  13. Kierkegaard, Søren. (1995). Works of Love. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  14. Kierkegaard, Søren. (2015). The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Oriented Deliberation in View of the Dogmatic Problem of Hereditary Sin. Liveright.
  15. Kierkegaard, Søren & Bruce H. Kirmmse. (2023). Fear and Trembling: A New Translation. Liveright.
  16. Krishek, Sharon. (2010). Kierkegaard on Faith and Love. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770517.
  17. Lippitt, John. (2013). Kierkegaard and the Problem of Self-Love. NewYork: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565110.
  18. Lippitt, John. (2017). Kierkegaard on Love. In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Love. Christopher Grau and Aaron Smuts (eds), p. 365–382. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395729.013.23.
  19. Milkovich, John, "Being-in-love: Kierkegaard and existential love" (2022). Senior Honors Theses and Projects. 745. https://commons.emich.edu/honors/745.
  20. Minister Stephen et al (Eds.). (2017). Kierkegaard’s God and the Good Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  21. Pattison, George & Kate Kirkpatrick. (2018). Kierkegaard: Annihilation in love. The Mystical Sources of Existentialist Thought. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107509.
  22. Rudd, A. and John Davenport (2015). Love, Reason and Will: Kierkegaard After Frankfurt. New York and London: Bloomsbury.
  23. Smith, S. (2016). From Tyrant to Martyr: Politics and Love in Kierkegaard. Perspectives on Political Science, 46(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2016.1190262
  24. Søltoft, P. (2013). Kierkegaard and the Sheer Phenomenon of Love. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook, 2013(1), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1515/kier.2013.2013.1.289.
  25. Verbin, N. Love & Self-Sacrifice: Kierkegaard, Maimonides and the Poor Spouse Predicament. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 93, 121–145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09848-9
  26. Walsh, Sylvia. (2015). “The Dear Self: Self-Love, Redoubling, and Self-Denial” in Love, Reason and Will: Kierkegaard after Frankfurt. Anthony Rudd and John Davenport (ed.). New York and London: Bloomsbury, 117-136.
  27. Zimmerman, Douglas. (2024). The Dialectics of Faith: Kierkegaard, Irony, and Conversion. USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/10587.