Optimizing student learning achievement through education management and learning technology utilization

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 16, 2025
https://doi.org/10.46362/ijs.v1i1.42
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Service

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Widjaja Sugiri
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Widya Agape

Abstract

This article discusses the impact of educational management and the utilization of learning technology on students' academic achievement. The background of this study is driven by the challenges faced by educators in improving the quality of education and students' academic performance in the digital era. The aim of this article is to examine how effective educational management and the integration of learning technology can contribute to enhancing students' academic performance. The method used in this article is a literature review that examines various studies related to educational management and learning technology. The results of the research show that good educational management, such as creating a conducive learning climate and the role of educational leaders in motivating teachers, can significantly improve students' performance. Additionally, learning technology, especially interactive learning applications, allows students to learn more independently, flexibly, and collaboratively, which in turn enhances their engagement and achievement.


 


Artikel ini membahas pengaruh manajemen pendidikan dan pemanfaatan teknologi pembelajaran terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Latar belakang penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tantangan yang dihadapi oleh pendidik dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan dan prestasi akademik siswa di era digital. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana manajemen pendidikan yang efektif dan integrasi teknologi pembelajaran dapat berkontribusi pada peningkatan prestasi belajar siswa. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah studi literatur yang mengkaji berbagai penelitian terkait manajemen pendidikan dan teknologi pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manajemen pendidikan yang baik, seperti pengelolaan iklim belajar yang kondusif dan peran pemimpin pendidikan dalam memotivasi guru, secara signifikan dapat meningkatkan prestasi siswa. Selain itu, teknologi pembelajaran, terutama aplikasi pembelajaran interaktif, memungkinkan siswa untuk belajar lebih mandiri, fleksibel, dan kolaboratif, yang pada gilirannya meningkatkan keterlibatan dan prestasi mereka.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sugiri, W. (2025). Optimizing student learning achievement through education management and learning technology utilization. Indonesian Journal of Service, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46362/ijs.v1i1.42

References

  1. Anderson, C. A., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  2. Blase, J. J., & Blase, J. R. (2000). Effective school leadership: Developing principals for today's schools. SAGE Publications.
  3. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-17.
  4. Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational management. SAGE Publications.
  5. Day, C. (2000). The challenge of leading schools. Routledge.
  6. Fullan, M. (2014). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
  7. Harris, J., & Rea, S. (2011). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Pearson Education.
  8. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  9. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Springer.
  10. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  11. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Press.
  12. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
  13. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
  14. Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.
  15. Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational leadership and school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 221-258.
  16. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2013). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. Jossey-Bass.
  17. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR model and technology integration: An overview. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
  18. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Pearson.
  19. Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education.
  20. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Pearson Education.
  21. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).
  22. Steinberg, L. (2016). Adolescence. McGraw-Hill Education.
  23. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. Pearson Education.
  25. Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.