Katekismus Heidelberg: Sebuah Eksposisi Atas Pertanyaan Pertama khususnya kata “Penghiburan” The Heidelberg Catechism: An Exposition of the First Question, Especially the Word “Comfort” Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 14, 2023
https://doi.org/10.46362/ijr.v6i1.31
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Religious, Vol.6, No.1 (April 2023)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Timotius Timotius
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah
Bobby Kurnia Putrawan
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-7883

Abstract

The Heidelberg Catechism’s opening question, with its emphasis on “consolation,” represents a profound theological and pastoral exploration of the human condition. It underscores the enduring quest for true comfort, rooted in faith in Jesus Christ, and offers solace and hope amid life’s uncertainties and the inevitability of death. Understanding the historical context, theological depth, and practical implications of this question enhances one’s appreciation for the enduring relevance of the Heidelberg Catechism in the Christian tradition. Further study and reflection on its teachings can enrich the spiritual journey of believers seeking lasting consolation in their faith. This article aims to explain that the first question in the Helderberg Catechism is Theocentric. This is because there are scholars who say that the Heidelberg Catechism is very people-centered because it starts with a question that seems to tend to emphasize human needs. The author uses the literature method in this study. The final result of this study the author will show that the Helderberg Catechism is Theocentric, not People-Centered because the first question in the Helderberg Catechism is based on the awareness that God is the true source of comfort so that Christians only want to seek true comfort from God.


 


Pertanyaan pembuka Katekismus Heidelberg, dengan penekanannya pada "penghiburan", mewakili sebuah eksplorasi teologis dan pastoral yang mendalam tentang kondisi manusia. Katekismus ini menggarisbawahi pencarian abadi akan penghiburan sejati, yang berakar pada iman kepada Yesus Kristus, dan menawarkan penghiburan serta pengharapan di tengah ketidakpastian hidup dan keniscayaan kematian. Memahami konteks historis, kedalaman teologis, dan implikasi praktis dari pertanyaan ini akan meningkatkan apresiasi seseorang terhadap relevansi abadi Katekismus Heidelberg dalam tradisi Kristen. Studi lebih lanjut dan refleksi atas ajaran-ajarannya dapat memperkaya perjalanan spiritual orang-orang percaya yang mencari penghiburan yang kekal dalam iman mereka. Artikel ini bertujuan menjelaskan bahwa pertanyaan pertama dalam Katekismus Helderberg bersifat Theosentris. Hal ini dikarenakan ada sarjana yang mengatakan bahwa Katekismus Heidelberg tersebut sangat people-centered karena memulainya dengan pertanyaan yang terkesan cenderung menekankan kebutuhan manusia. Penulis memakai metode literatur dalam penelitian ini. Hasil akhir dari penelitian ini penulis akan menunjukkan bahwa  Katekismus Helderberg bersifat Theosentris bukan People Centered karena pertanyaan pertama dalam Katekismus Helderberg didasarkan atas kesadaran bahwa Allah adalah sumber penghiburan sejati sehingga orang Kristen hanya mau mencari penghiburan sejati dari Allah.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Timotius, T., & Putrawan, B. K. (2023). Katekismus Heidelberg: Sebuah Eksposisi Atas Pertanyaan Pertama khususnya kata “Penghiburan”: The Heidelberg Catechism: An Exposition of the First Question, Especially the Word “Comfort”. Indonesian Journal of Religious, 6(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.46362/ijr.v6i1.31

References

  1. Ballor, Jordan J. “Abraham Kuyper and the Economic Teachings of the Heidelberg,” 23, no. 2 (2020): 363-390.
  2. Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics, abridged edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Academics, 2011.
  3. Beeke, Joel R. “Catechism Preaching,” Puritan Reformed Journal 2 (2015): 215-242.
  4. Beeke, Joel R. and Eric D. Bristley. “Teach All Nations: The Use of the Heidelberg Catechism in North America and throughout the Non-European World,” The Westminster Theological Journal 78, no. 2 (2016): 287-297.
  5. Berkhof, Louis. Doktrin Allah, Jilid 1 dari Teologi Sistematika, terj. Yudha Thianto. Surabaya: Momentum dan Lembaga Reformed Injili Indonesia, 1993.
  6. Bierma, Lyle D. An Introduction to The Heidelberg Catechism: Source, History, and Theology. Baker Academic; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005.
  7. Blum, Edwin A. “1 Peter” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary vol 12, Frank E. Gaebelein, ed. Grand Rapid: The zondervan Corporation, 1981.
  8. Brown, Colin. Filsafat & Iman Kristen 1. Surabaya: Lembaga Reformed Injili Indonesia, 1994.
  9. Carson, D. A. “Mattew,” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1984.
  10. Dreyer, Wim A.. The Heidelberg Catechism: A 16th century quest for unity. HTS Theological Studies, 70(1), 01-05. (2014). http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222014000100043&lng=en&tlng=en.
  11. Gunawan, Freddy. “Meneropong Teks Dalam Konteks: Katekismus Heidelberg P/J 53,” Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 16, no. 1 (2017): 91-102.
  12. Kloster, Fred H. A Mighty Comfort. Grand Rapids: CRC Pubs, 1990.
  13. Mayer, John. Catechism Or Christian Instruction. Heldelberg: The Electoral City, 1563.
  14. Plantinga, Cornelius, Jr. A Place to Stand. Grand Rapids: CRC Pubs., 1979.
  15. Tenney, Merrill C. “The Gospel of John” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary vol 9, Frank E. Gaebelein, ed. Grand Rapids: The zondervan Corporation, 1981.
  16. Ursinus, Zacharias. The Commentary of Dr. Zacharias Ursinus on the Heidelberg Catechism. Tran. And ed. Lyle D. Bierma. Grand Rapids: CRC Pubs., 1979.
  17. Ursinus, Zakharias dan Caspar Olevianus. Katekismus Heidelberg: Pengajaran Agama Kristen. Di terjemahkan oleh Tim BPK Gunung Mulia. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1991.
  18. Ursinus, Zacharias dan Caspar Olevianus. “The Heidelberg Catechism.” The Three Forms of Unity, no. September (2010): 65–116, https://www.crcna.org/sites/default/files/HeidelbergCatechism.pdf.
  19. Ursinus, Zakharias dan Caspar Olevianus. Keterangan Katekismus Heidelberg. Melolo, Sumba Timur: Sekolah Theologi Gereja-Gereja Reformasi di Indonesia, 1990.
  20. Van Vlastuin, Willem. “The Joy of the Law.” Journal of Reformed Theology 9, no. 2 (2015): 166-181.
  21. Wiersbe, Warren W. Benar di Dalam Kristus. Bandung: Kalam Hidup, 1977.